Buy on Amazon.com

My Favorite Pages

Please login first to manage your favorite pages.

We like you! Like us!

toolbar powered by Conduit
Criteria for Defining Formulaic Sequences Print E-mail
Linguistics - Formulaic Language
Written by V. Temina-Kingsolver   
Friday, 01 August 2008 22:49
Article Index
Criteria for Defining Formulaic Sequences
Transparency of Meaning
Holistic Storage/Processing
Fixedness vs. Flexibility
Fluency of Articulation
Functions/Purposes of Use
Semantic Prosody
Length
References
All Pages

Scholars in different fields studied the issue of formulaic sequences, namely in general linguistics, corpus linguistics, phraseology, lexicography, psycholinguistics, neurolinguistics, first and second language acquisition and others.

They all looked at formulaic sequences with their own theoretical perspectives and different criteria. Thus, according to Schmitt & Carter (2004), corpus linguistics used the most common criteria: institutionalization, fixedness, non-compositionality and frequency of occurrence.

Specialists in the areas of psycholinguistics and language acquisition draw on such criteria as familiarity with sequences by individual participants, and holistic storage of the sequences. Multiple production of the same sequence is used as evidence for the former criterion and intact intonation contour for the latter.

Schmitt and Carter (2004) suggest that both linguistic and psycholinguistic criteria should be applied to the definition of formulaic sequences. Besides the criteria named above, there are some other possible criteria used to identify when a word string is a formulaic sequence.

Each one of the criteria is presented separately below. The criteria are used in regard to form, meaning and use of multi-word sequences.



 
Bookmark and Share

Our Latest Tweets

Support Language Avenue - Visit our Bookstore

Search Amazon.com


Statistics

Members : 387
Content : 301
Web Links : 35
Content View Hits : 450778